Lesson Plan

Colloquium III - "Creating a Nation"

Mr. George Levy
Madison County School System

UNIT IN WHICH THE LESSON WILL/COULD BE INCLUDED
A More Perfect Union

MISSISSIPPI CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK COMPETENCY 
4. Analyze relationships between people, places, and environment using social studies tools.

6. Analyze the ideals, principles, and practices of citizens in a democratic society.

ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS  

How does historical evidence explain:
the forces that shaped the Constitution?
why our government is based on written documents?
whether the Constitution was a nationalist victory over state autonomy?
whether the Articles of Confederation were replaced solely because they were inadequate?
who the Constitution ultimately serves?  

HISTORICAL CONTENT OF LESSON

People: Founders - Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison John Adams  

Events: Annapolis Conference, Constitutional convention  

Places: Annapolis, Maryland; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  

Key terms, dates, etc.: Annapolis Conference, Constitution, autonomy  

HISTORICAL CONCEPTS AND THEMES
values, beliefs, political ideas, and institutions; conflict and cooperation; civilization, cultural diffusion, and interaction; comparative history of major developments in the past; patterns of social and political interaction.  

HISTORICAL SKILLS/PROCESS
finding and analyzing primary sources; detecting bias; developing empathy for people in the past; relating past to present; appreciating the importance of the irrational and accidental in history and human affairs; evaluating primary sources from Internet sources.

BOOKS/PERIODICALS
Bailyn, Bernard, ed. The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters during the Struggle over Ratification. New York: Literary Classic of the United States, Inc., 1993.

Meltzer, Milton, The American Revolutionaries: A History in their Own Words- 1750-1800. New York: Harper Trophy, 1995.

INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES
Introduction: Students will work in groups to research an American figure from the late 18^th century. They will choose someone involved in the writing of the Constitution OR a representative of one of the groups excluded from the debate. Possibilities include James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Hiawatha, Benjamin Banneker, Daniel Shays, and Abigail Adams.

Directions: Each group is to research two figures and write 5 biographical facts about each during their research. They will create a name card for the Historical Figures with a visual symbol for the Historical Figures’ beliefs.

1. The student should find facts in a mix of categories, such as: life experience, beliefs, accomplishments, connection to the Constitution.
2. They will predict their figures’ opinion of the Constitution. What would they like about it? Dislike about it?
3. Read the quote from your figure and answer the following question:
   What is your figure’s opinion of the Constitution?
4. Use an excerpt from the quote that best summarizes the figure’s opinion and explain what it means in your own words.
5. What evidence does your figure provide to support his/her opinion? Find three pieces of evidence and list them in your own words.
6. Write a speech that your figure would deliver to the Constitutional Convention, either supporting the Constitution or explaining a problem it has. If your figure does not like an aspect of the Constitution, ask the convention members to make a specific change. If he/she does like it, explain why a change in the Constitution would be negative.    

Benjamin Banneker’s letter to Thomas Jefferson:

"I suppose it is a truth too well attested to you, to need a proof here, that we are a race of Beings who have long laboured under the abuse and censure of the world, that we have long been looked upon with an eye of contempt, and that we have long been considered rather as brutish than human, and Scarcely capable of mental endowments.... I apprehend you will readily embrace every opportunity to eradicate that train of absurd and false ideas and opinions which so generally prevail with respect to us, and that your Sentiments are concurrent with mine."

"Here, Sir, was a time in which your tender feelings for your selves engaged you thus to declare, you were then impressed with proper ideas of the great valuation of liberty, and the free possession of those blessings to which you were entitled by nature; but Sir how pitiable it is to reflect, that although you were so fully convinced of the benevolence of the Father of mankind, and of his equal and impartial distribution of those rights and privileges which he had conferred upon them, that you should at the Same time counteract his mercies, in detaining by fraud and violence so numerous a part of my brethren under groaning captivity and cruel oppression, that you should at the same time be found guilty of that most criminal act, which you professedly detested in others, with respect to yourselves."

Benjamin Franklin at the end of the Constitutional Convention:

"I confess that I do not entirely approve of this constitution at present, but Sir, I am not sure I shall never approve it. For having lived long, I have experienced many instances of being obliged, by better information or fuller consideration, to change opinions even on important subjects, which I had once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow, the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment and to pay more respect to the judgment of others. ...

In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this constitution with all its faults, if they are such. ... I doubt too whether any other convention we can obtain may be able to make a better constitution. For when you assemble a number of men to have the advantage of their joint wisdom, you inevitably assemble with those men all their prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interests, and their selfish views. From such an assembly can a perfect political production be expected? It therefore astonishes me, Sir, to find this system approaching so near to perfection as it does. ... Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors I sacrifice to the public good. I have never whispered a syllable of them abroad. Within these walls they were born, and here they shall die."

James Madison, excerpt from "The Federalist #10," in which he argues that a good government controls all groups within it (He calls them "factions.") by keeping any group from getting too much control of any others. He uses this argument to defend the Constitution against charges that it gives too much control to the national government over states and individuals:

"Among the numerous advantages promised by a well constructed union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction. ... The instability, injustice, and confusion, introduced into the public councils, have, in truth, been the mortal diseases under which popular governments have everywhere perished. ... Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens...that our governments are too unstable; that the public good is disregarded in the conflicts of rival parties; and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority.

____ [Factions] account for many of our heaviest misfortunes; and, particularly, for that prevailing and increasing distrust of public engagements, and alarm for private rights, which are echoed from one end of the continent to the other.

____ By a faction, I understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common impulse of passion, or if interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent...interests of the community.

[Madison then suggests that a republic, a form of government in which many people elect a few representatives to make laws for them, keeps factions from gaining power. The larger the number of people voting, he says, the harder it is for one faction to convince everybody to vote for the same person or the same cause.]

George Washington’s letter, as president of the Constitutional Convention, submitting the Constitution to the President of the Congress:

"We have now the honor to submit to the consideration of the United States in Congress assembled, that Constitution which has appeared to us the most advisable.

The friends of our country have long seen and desired, that the power of making war, peace, and treaties, that of levying money and regulating commerce, and the correspondent executive and judicial authorities should be fully and effectually vested in the general government of the Union: But the impropriety of delegating such extensive trust to one body of men is evident Hence results the necessity of a different organization.

It is obviously impractical in the federal government of these states, to secure all rights of independent sovereignty to each, and yet provide for the interest and safety of all: Individuals entering into society, must give up a share of liberty to preserve the rest. The magnitude of the sacrifice must depend as well on situation and circumstances, as on the object to be obtained. It is at all times difficult to draw with precision the line between those rights which must be surrendered, and those which may be reserved; and on the present occasion this difficulty was increased by a difference among the several states as to their situation, extent, habits, and particular interests.

In all our deliberations on this subject we kept steadily in our view, that which appears to us the greatest interest of every true American, the consolidation of our Union, in which is involved our prosperity, felicity, safety, perhaps our national existence. This important consideration, seriously and deeply impressed on our minds, led each state in the Convention to be less rigid on points of inferior magnitude, than might have been otherwise expected; and thus the Constitution, which we now present, is the result of a spirit of amity, and that of mutual deference and concession which the peculiarity of our political situation rendered indispensable.

That it will meet the full and entire approbation of every state is not perhaps to be expected; but each will doubtless consider that had her interest been alone consulted, the consequences might have been particularly disagreeable or injurious to others; that it is liable to as few exceptions as could reasonably have been expected, we hope and believe; that it will promote the lasting welfare of that country so dear to us all, and secure her freedom and happiness, is our most ardent wish.

With great respect, We have the honor to be, Sir,

Your Excellency’s

most humble and obedient servants,

George Washington, President

By unanimous Order of the Convention.

Abigail Adams to John Adams:

March 31, 1776

"In the new code of laws, which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies, and be more generous and favorable to them that [were] you ancestors. Do no put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular car and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to [instigate] a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.

That your sex are naturally tyrannical is a truth so thoroughly established as to admit of no dispute. But such of you as wish to be happy willingly give up the harsh title of master for the more tender and endearing one of friend. Why, then, not put it out of the power of the vicious and the lawless to use us with cruelty and indignity...? Men of sense in all ages abhor those customs which treat us only as the vassals of your sex. Regard us then as beings, placed by providence under your protection, and in imitation of the Supreme Being make use of that power only for our happiness."

John to Abigail

________________________________April 14, 1776

"As to your extraordinary code of laws, I cannot but laugh. We have been told that our struggle has loosened the bands of government everywhere. That children and apprentices were disobedient that schools and colleges were grown turbulent that Indians slighted their guardians and Negroes grew insolent to their masters. But your letter was the first intimation that anther tribe more numerous and powerful that all the rest [had] grown discontented. This is rather too coarse a compliment, but you are so saucy, I won’t blot it out.

Depend upon it, we know better than to repeal our masculine systems. Although they are in full force, you know they are little more than theory. We dare not exert our power in its full latitude. We are obliged to go fair and softly, and, in practice, you know, we are the subjects. We have only the name of masters, and rather than give up this, which would completely subject us to the despotism of the petticoat, I hope General Washington, and all our brave heroes would fight ... A fine story, indeed. I begin to think the ministry as deep as they are wicked. After stirring up Tories, landjobbers, trimmers, bigots, Canadians, Indians, Negroes, Hanoverians, Hessians, Russians, Irish Roman Catholics, Scotch... at last they have stimulated the [women] to demand new privileges and [to] threaten to rebel."

Abigail to John

________________________________May 7, 1776

"I cannot say that I think you are very generous to the ladies. For, whilst you are proclaiming peace and good will to men, emancipating all nations, you insist upon retaining an absolute power over wives. But you must remember that arbitrary power is like most other things which are very hard very liable to be broken; and, notwithstanding all your wise laws and maxims, we have it in our power not only to free ourselves but to subdue our masters, and without violence throw both your natural and legal authority at our feet."

Amos Singletary, a farmer, at the Massachusetts State Ratifying Committee, 1788

(Use in lieu of actual words from Daniel Shays similar views.)

"Mr. President, I should not have troubled the Convention again, if some gentlemen had not called on them that were on the stage in the beginning of our troubles, in the year 1775. I was one of them. I have had the honor to be a member of the court all the time, Mr. President, and I say that, if any body had proposed such a Constitution as this in that day, it would have been thrown away at once. It would not have been looked at. We contended with Great Britain, some said for a three-penny duty on tea; but it was not that; it was because they claimed a right to tax us and bind us in all cases whatever. And does not this Constitution do the same? Does it not lay all taxes, duties, [import fees], and excises? And what more have we to give? ... These lawyers, and men of learning, and moneyed men, that talk so finely and gloss over matters so smoothly, to make us poor illiterate people swallow down the pill, expect to get into Congress themselves; they expect to be the managers of this Constitution, and get all the power and all the money into their own hands, and then they will swallow up all us little folks, like the great Leviathan, Mr. President; yes, just as the whale swallowed up Jonah."

Excerpt from the Constitution of the Iroquois Nations:

"I am Dekanawidah and with the Five Nations’ Confederate Lords I plant the Tree of Great Peace. ... Under the shade of this Tree of the Great Peace we spread the soft white feathery down of the globe thistle as seats for you ... Lords.

We place you upon those seats, spread soft with the feathery down of the globe thistle, there beneath the shade of the spreading branches of the Tree of Peace. There shall you sit and watch the Council Fire of the Confederacy of the Five Nations, and all the affairs of the Five Nations shall be transacted at this place before you.

Roots have spread out from the Tree of the Great Peace, one to the north, one to the east, one to the south, and one to the west. The name of these roots is the Great White Roots and their name is Peace and Strength.

If any man or any nation outside the Five Nations shall obey the laws of the Great Peace and make known their disposition to the Lords of the Confederacy, they may trace the roots to the Tree and if their minds are clean and they are obedient and promise to obey the wishes of the Confederate council, they shall be welcomed to the shelter beneath the Tree of the Long Leaves.

To you Adodarhoh, the Onondaga cousin Lords, I and the other Confederate Lords have entrusted the caretaking and the watching of the Five Nations Council fire. the Firekeepers shall formally open and close all councils of the Confederate Lords, and they shall pass upon all matters deliberated upon by the two sides to render their decision.

Mohawk chief Hiawatha, quoting from the legendary Dekaniwah speaking to the Iroquois:

"We bind ourselves together by taking hold of each others’ hands so firmly and forming a circle so strong that if a tree should fall upon it, it could not shake nor break it, so that our people and grandchildren shall remain in the circle in security, peace and happiness."

The Above Primary Source Material is Quoted From: Milton Meltzer, The American Revolutionaries: A History in their Own Words- 1750-1800. New York: Harper Trophy, 1995.