FINANCIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
In order to ensure the integrity of research, scholarship, and creative activity at Southern Miss, all members of the University community are responsible for appropriately disclosing and managing financial conflicts of interest.
Reason for Policy/Purpose
The University of Southern Mississippi is committed to the integrity of research, scholarship, and creative activity, and is therefore committed to several values that are potentially threatened by relationships between University employees and external entities. These values include objectivity and transparency in the conduct of research and scholarship; the freedom and the responsibility to pursue ideas, creative activities, and to publish work results; the rights of both human and animal research subjects; and responsibilities to our students. Relationships with commercial and noncommercial outside entities often support these values and are a customary part of academic life. However, conflicts of interest created by these relationships can also challenge the University’s commitments and its mission. Effective management of these relationships is thus necessary to ensure the integrity of our work so that it continues to contribute to the public good.
Those who are covered by this policy are responsible for avoiding or minimizing financial conflicts of interest and for dealing with them appropriately when they arise. It is wrong to allow the prospect of personal gain to unduly influence decisions made on behalf of other scholars, students, the profession, or the University. Nevertheless, conflicts of interest are often unavoidable, and merely having a conflict of interest does not entail wrongdoing.
The purpose of this policy is to set forth The University of Southern Mississippi’s expectations and procedures for disclosing and managing financial conflicts of interest. This policy is intended to comply with Public Health Service (PHS) regulations 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart F and 45 CFR 94 (published 8.25.11), the NSF Grant Policy Manual (effective 7.1.2005), and policies of the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning. It is not intended to address the improper use of office as defined in the Mississippi Ethics in Government Law.
Who Needs to Know This Policy
This policy applies to all full-time faculty members of The University of Southern Mississippi and select students, staff and others as described below. All the aforementioned have a responsibility to know and abide by its provisions. The Vice President for Research is responsible for ensuring its implementation and may suspend activities until the relevant issues have been appropriately resolved. Violations of this policy may constitute grounds for disciplinary or other administrative action consistent with other University policies and procedures.
Website Address for this Policy
1.0 Employee Responsibilities
1.1 All University full-time faculty members are responsible for completing a financial conflict of interest disclosure form annually and for completing an updated disclosure form within 30 days of a change in status. The form requires reporting Significant Financial Interests as defined above. All investigators on externally-funded projects – including post-doctoral associates, students, staff, collaborators at other institutions, and subcontractors – must also complete disclosures when required by sponsors. Electronic disclosure is available via the ORI website at http://www.usm.edu/research/financial-conflict-interest.
1.2 When external sponsors require training in Financial Conflicts of Interest, as is the case for PHS-funded projects, all investigators on such projects must complete the training prior to expenditure of grant funds. The training modules are part of the University’s Research and Scholarly Integrity Assurance Program (formerly RCR), coordinated by the Office of Research Integrity. FCOI training must be completed every four years.
1.3 Individuals with conflicts determined to be FCOIs are responsible for adhering to agreed-upon resolution plans.
1.4 An individual who refuses to accept the resolution plan proposed by the DO may appeal to the President of the University. Such an appeal must be in writing and must be presented to the President within five working days of receipt of the decision from the DO.
2.0 Designated Official (DO) Responsibilities
2.1 When financial interests that might interfere with an individual’s fulfillment of his or her institutional responsibilities are disclosed, the DO is responsible for reviewing the disclosure in a timely manner, determining the significance of the financial interest, and reaching a final decision as to whether or not the situation is a financial conflict of interest. To assist in these judgments, the DO may appoint an ad hoc Conflict of Interest Review Committee (COIRC) in an advisory capacity.
2.2 When the DO decides that a disclosed conflict is a financial conflict of interest, as defined above, the DO is responsible for coming to an agreement with the investigator regarding an appropriate resolution plan and for ensuring adherence to the resolution plan. In these decisions, the DO should consult with the ad hoc COIRC committee. Resolution plans might include, but are not limited to, public disclosure; monitoring of research by independent reviewers; modification of the research plan; disqualification from participation in certain portions of the work, scholarship, or creative activity; divestiture of the SFIs; or severance of relationships.
2.3 The DO is responsible for making required FCOI reports to external sponsors or for designating someone else to make the requisite reports.
2.4 In the event of non-compliance with either this policy or an agreed-upon resolution plan, the DO is responsible for implementing the appropriate disciplinary actions. Disciplinary actions could include the suspension of certain activities, increased monitoring, or other arrangements.
2.5 In the event that non-compliance is reasonably likely to have interfered with an individual’s research, scholarly or creative activity, the DO is responsible for conducting a retrospective review. For the purpose of this review, the DO may appoint a COIRC in an advisory capacity. The purpose of retrospective review is to ascertain whether and to what extent the interference took place and how and whether the damaging effects of the interference can be eliminated or mitigated. At the conclusion of the review, the DO must produce a written report detailing the Financial Conflict of Interest, findings, and conclusions. If non-compliance occurs in work related to a Public Health Service (PHS) grant, the DO must update any previously submitted reports to the PHS, specifying actions needed to manage the Financial Conflict of Interest going forward.
3.0 Key Personnel Responsibilities
3.1 Key Personnel on externally-funded projects are responsible for ensuring that other Investigators working on the project have also completed the annual disclosure and the relevant training. This might include post-doctoral associates, students, staff, collaborators at other institutions, and subcontractors.
4.0 Conflict of Interest Review Committee (COIRC) Responsibilities
4.1 The COIRC is responsible for advising the DO regarding whether a disclosed conflict is an FCOI; for proposing resolution plans to eliminate, reduce, or manage disclosed conflicts, as appropriate, in consultation with the relevant individual(s); and for assisting the DO in conducting a retrospective review in the case of non-compliance.
4.2 Upon completing its deliberations, the COIRC will present its findings and recommendations to the DO in writing. After final review, the DO will notify the relevant individual and the Director of Sponsored Programs Administration of his or her decision. Resolution Plans must be signed by the individual, the DO, and the chair, director, or other immediate supervisor of the individual’s unit.
5.0 Office of Research Integrity (ORI) Responsibilities
5.1 ORI is responsible for ensuring that all regular University full-time faculty members complete an annual FCOI disclosure and updates when necessary.
5.2 The Office of Research Integrity is responsible for making FCOI training materials available to investigators who are required to complete the training and for ensuring that they complete the training as necessary.
6.0 Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA) Responsibilities
6.1 Depending on the requirements of external sponsors, SPA is responsible for ensuring that sub-recipient Investigators comply with the relevant regulations, such as PHS regulations found at 42 CFR 50.604.
The Director of the Office of Research Integrity is responsible for the review of this policy every four years (or whenever circumstances require immediate review).
Disclosure Form: http://www.usm.edu/research/financial-conflict-interestDisclosure Addendum Form: http://www.usm.edu/research/financial-conflict-interest
Amendments: Month, Day, Year – summary of changes
03/07/13: Formatted for template.